Naming the problem is hard.
About 64% of survey respondents struggled to define precisely what they didn’t understand.
Students had calendars, notes, and to-do lists. But a question kept getting lost between them: what do I actually need to understand better?
An initial HCI research study into how undergraduate students recognize, describe, and address their learning gaps.
About 64% of survey respondents struggled to define precisely what they didn’t understand.
About 53% postponed addressing a gap after they had noticed it.
About 83% valued tools that required little unnecessary effort or maintenance.
Reported percentages from the initial 36-person survey, not measurements of GapTracker’s impact. Source: HCI user research report ↗
Course-linked topics and editable gaps give uncertainty a concrete place to live.
Exam timelines and readiness make the upcoming work visible.
Critical gaps prioritize by severity and urgency. Today’s Focus turns them into a daily plan.
Private, student-controlled progress keeps the focus on your own understanding.
The original academic research was conducted by Ehab Marrid and Saleem Trudi, combining an anonymous online survey, interviews, personas, and product exploration.
Ehab continued the project independently, designing and developing the native iPhone and iPad app, its study workflows, and the current product documentation.
The idea stayed the same: make understanding gaps easier to see, easier to act on, and less likely to be forgotten until exam week.
Explore the product documents ↗This was a small study, largely drawn from similar academic environments. It may not represent every institution or discipline. The figures describe participants’ experiences; they do not demonstrate improved grades or prove product effectiveness.
GapTracker’s readiness score is a planning and prioritization indicator. It has not been scientifically validated as a predictor of exam performance.
Research summary and limitations ↗Free to download · iPhone & iPad · No GapTracker account